《马太·亨利圣经注释》序言Preface to Matthew Henry's Commentary
Preface to Matthew Henry's Commentary
by Archibald Alexander
From the first American edition (Philadelphia 1828) of Matthew Henry's Exposition of the Old and New Testaments (1708-1710)
Commentaries on the Bible may be conveniently divided into two kinds, the critical and practical .
The first, by a grammatical analysis of the words and phrases of the original text, endeavor to ascertain the literal meaning of each passage; and to enable others to judge of the correctness of the interpretation, the whole critical process is spread before the reader. Helps of this sort are very important to the learned, for, in all cases, the literal sense must be determined before any proper use can be made of the text, or any other interpretation founded on it. The propriety, force, and meaning of a metaphor, or an allegory, can only be known by first understanding the literal meaning of the words employed; and the same is true in regard to what may be called the mystical, or spiritual, meaning, of any passage of Scripture.
But, however necessary this critical analysis may be, it can be useful to none but the learned. Commentaries of another kind, therefore, are required for common readers, who have as deep an interest involved in the truths of the Bible, as the critical scholar; and who are as much bound in duty to search the Scriptures: for as every man must give account of himself, both of his faith and practice, he must have the right to judge for himself.
The best helps ought, therefore, to be provided, to enable all classes of men to form correct opinions on the all-important subject of religion. For this reason, many practical expositions, not only of detached passages and single books, but of the whole Bible, have been composed, and have been extensively useful in elucidating the Scriptures; and in teaching how the truths of revelation may be applied to regulate the hearts and direct the lives of men.
In this class, Henry's Exposition holds a distinguished place. This work has now been before the Christian community for more than a hundred years, and has, from its first publication, been so well received, and is so generally approved, that all recommendation of the work itself seems to be now superfluous. It has, indeed, become a standard work in theology; not with the people of one denomination only, but with the friends of sound piety and evangelical religion, of every name. Many other valuable commentaries, it is true, have been given to the public since this work was first edited, and have deservedly gained for themselves a high estimation and extensive circulation. But it may be safely said, that Henry's Exposition of the Bible has not been superseded by any of these publications; and in those points in which its peculiar excellence consists, remain unrivaled.
For some particular purposes, and in some particular respects, other commentaries may be preferable; but, taking it as a whole, and as adapted to every class of readers, this commentary may be said to combine more excellencies than any work of the kind which was ever written, in any language. And this is not the opinion of one, or a few persons, but thousands of judicious theologians have been of the same mind; and it may be predicted, that as long as the English language shall remain unchanged, Henry's Exposition will be highly appreciated by the lovers of true religion.
Our object in this preface is, to endeavor to point out some of the more distinguishing characteristics of this great work, and to offer some motives to induce Christians of our country to study it.
Before I proceed farther, however, I would remark, that the principal excellence of this Exposition does not consist in solving difficulties which may be found in Scripture. On this ground, complaint is sometimes heard from those who consult this commentary, that they may obtain light on obscure and perplexed passages, of being disappointed in their expectations; and that, while plain passages are largely expounded, those which are difficult are briefly touched, or passed over without notice.
To this objection it may be answered, that to exhibit the use and application of those parts of Scripture which are not involved in difficulty, is far more important for practical purposes, than the elucidation of obscure passages. It is a general, and surely it is a comfortable fact, that those parts of Scripture which are most obscure are least important . But the same objection might be made, and indeed has been made, to all commentaries, that they leave the difficult texts as obscure as they found them; from which the only legitimate inference is, that, in regard to a large portion of texts of difficult interpretation, the learned and unlearned stand very much on the same level; yet, doubtless, much light has been shed on many things in the Scriptures, by the labors of the learned.
And although we do not claim for this commentator the highest place among Biblical critics, yet we have a right to say, that Henry was a sound and ripe scholar; and especially, is said by his biographers to have been an excellent Hebrew scholar. We are not to suppose, because no parade of critical learning is exhibited in these volumes, that the author did not critically examine every text.
As the orator is said to practice the art of eloquence most perfectly, when all appearance of are is concealed; so we may say, that he makes the best use of the critical art in the instruction of the people, who furnishes them with the results, without bringing at all into view the learned process by which they were arrived at.
One fact is certain from internal evidence, that Mr. Henry wrote his Commentary on the Old and New Testaments, with the learned compilation of Poole, called Criticorum Synopsis, open before him; as, in all difficult passages, he has judiciously selected that opinion from the many presented in this work, which, upon the whole, seems to be most probable.
But, while we contend that our author is a sound and ingenious expositor, as it related to the literal interpretation of Scripture; yet we do not found his claim to pre-eminence on his critical acumen, or profound erudition — but on qualities which shall now be distinctly brought into view.
1. To begin, then, with the style of this work, I would remark, that two qualities, not often united, are here combined, perspicuity and conciseness. That the style is perspicuous needs no other proof than the examination of any page of the Exposition. And when I attribute perspicuity to this composition, I use the word in direct reference to the capacity and apprehension of the unlearned reader. A style chiefly formed of words of a foreign origin, may be as perspicuous to a learned man as any other; but not so to the common reader, who is only familiar with that kind of language which is commonly used in conversation. For the most part, Mr. Henry's style is made up of pure old English words, and therefore it is plain to every class of people; and is also familiar , because the words are the same as those all are accustomed to hear every day.
But it will not be so readily granted that the style is concise . The number and size of the volumes seem to lead to a different conclusion. And, indeed, when we see six folio volumes, written by one hand; the presumption is very natural and strong, that he must be a diffuse writer. This, however, in regard to our expositor, is not the fact. There are few books, in the English language, written in a more concise, sententious style, than Henry's Exposition. On examination, very few expletives will be found. Every word speaks, and every sentence is pregnant with meaning; so that I do not know how the book could be abridged in any other way than by leaving out a part of its contents. And we must distinguish between a long discourse and one which is diffuse: a short work may be very diffuse, while one of great length may not have a superfluous word.
2. Another quality of the style of this commentary is vivacity . This word does not exactly express the idea which I wish to convey, but it comes as near it as any one I can think of at present. I mean that pleasant turn of thought, in which we meet with unexpected associations of ideas, expressed in that concise and pointed form which, on other subjects, would be termed wit . Indeed, if I were permitted to invent a phrase to indicate the quality of which I am now speaking, I would call it spiritual wit .
It has, by some, been called a cheerful style; and certainly, the reading of this work has a tendency not only to keep the attention awake, but to diffuse a cheerful emotion through the soul. He must be a very bad man who would become gloomy by the perusal of Henry's Commentary.
Now, I need not say how important this quality is in a composition of such extent. Without it, however excellent the matter, weariness would take hold of the reader a thousand times before he had finished the work. This seems to have been the natural turn and complexion of the pious author's thoughts. There is no affectation; no unnatural comparisons, or strained antitheses. It is true, there is an approach to what is called quaintness , and a frequent play on words and phrases of similar sound, but different meaning; but, although these things are not conformable to the standard of modern taste, yet they are very agreeable to the great mass of the people, and give such a zest in the perusal of the work, that we can scarcely allow ourselves to indulge a wish, that the style were in any respect different from what it is.
3. But a characteristic of this Exposition of a more important kind than any that have been mentioned is, the fertility and variety of godly sentiment , manifest throughout the work. The mind of the author seems not only to have been imbued with excellent spiritual ideas, but to have teemed with them. It is comparable to a perennial fountain, which continually sends forth streams of living water. In deriving rich instruction and consolation from the sacred oracles, adapted to all the various conditions and characters of men, the author displays a fertility of thought, and an ingenuity in making the application of divine truth, which strikes us with admiration.
The resources of most men would have been exhausted in expounding a few books of the Bible; after which little more could have been expected, than commonplace matter, or the continual recurrence of the same ideas — but the riches of our expositor's mind seem to have been inexhaustible . He comes to every successive portion of the sacred Scriptures with a fullness and freshness of matter, and with a variety in his remarks, which while it instructs , at the same time refreshes us. Even in his exposition of those books which are very similar in their contents, as the gospels for example, we still find a pleasing variety in the notes of the commentator. It is difficult to conceive how one man should have been able to accomplish such a work, without any falling off in the style of execution.
It is true, indeed, that Mr. Henry did not live to put a finishing hand to the exposition. He had made ample preparations for the completion of the work, but while it was in the press, to the regret of all godly men, he was called away from the field of labor. But the providence of God, though mysterious , is always wise . It should be matter of lively gratitude, that this eminent servant of God was permitted to remain so long in our world, and to accomplish so much for the edification of the church, not only in his own, but in all future ages.
The commentary was completed by the author, as far as to the end of the Acts of the Apostles: the remaining books were expounded by certain of his friends, who were eminent for their theological knowledge and piety; and who, doubtless, availed themselves of the assistance of his papers, in executing the work, which they respectively undertook. Their names are prefixed to the books on which they severally wrote the commentary; and although the reader will be sensible of the lack of Mr. Henry's peculiar vivacity and happy turn of thought; yet he will find the continuation of the exposition executed in an able and judicious manner; and as near an approximation to the author's inimitable style, as could be expected from other hands.
4. There is perhaps no one thing which gives a more distinctive character to this performance, than the weighty, pithy, pointed sayings, with which it abounds. Whether these apothegms were, generally, the production of the author's ingenuity, or were collected from the common stock of English proverbs, current in his day — their value is the same to us.
The ancients appear to have understood, better than the moderns, the importance of the method of instruction by proverbs, or aphorisms. It was considered by them the highest effort of wisdom to invent proverbs, parables, or fables, which, in few words, convey much meaning . Several of those, called by way of eminence the Wise Men of Greece, are celebrated for no other productions, but a few sayings which met with general approbation, and which passed into proverbs.
The value of a stock of good proverbs to a nation cannot easily be too highly appreciated. These are kept in constant use and circulation, and are learned by all classes of people, without effort; and become, to the common people, the maxims by which life is regulated.
Nothing is more common, when a man's judgment has been suspended for a while, than to come to a decision, by the recollection of some proverb , or general maxim . Men are actually influenced by the knowledge which is present to their minds, at the moment when their purpose if formed, and this gives an advantage to apothegms over every other form in which useful knowledge is treasured up. While other learning is like treasure hoarded up, which cannot always be put into circulation at a moment's warning — these are comparable to the current coin of a nation, which is always ready, and always in circulation.
Perhaps a man might often be as useful to his country by inventing and putting into general circulation, a few pithy, pointed, moral or prudential maxims — as by writing an elaborate work on moral science, or political economy. It is a fact worthy of notice, that the peasantry or common people in some places, carry on their conversation very much by recollecting and repeating appropriate proverbs; and such people will generally be found to be more than usually discerning and prudent.
In the instruction of youth, this easy method of furnishing and fortifying their minds, ought not to be neglected. A father who instills into his children a large stock of sound, practical, moral, and prudential aphorisms — really leaves them a richer inheritance, than if he provided for them as many jewels .
We have, moreover, the highest authority for this mode of instruction. The Bible is replete with aphorisms of the most important kind; and one whole book, written by the wisest of men, contains nothing else but proverbs. Besides, many of our Lord's instructions were delivered in this form.
One of the most useful and esteemed works of the celebrated Erasmus, is, a collection of aphorisms, from all the writings of the Greek and Roman authors; and he who should judiciously make a collection of useful English apothegms, would confer a favor on the public at large. But it has occurred to the writer, many years since, that an excellent and useful little volume of choice sayings, might be collected from Henry's Commentary alone; and if any reader of this work should take the pains to make such a collection for his own use and that of his children or friends, he would never have occasion to repent of his labor. The exuberance of our author's mind in composing such apothegms; or his diligence in collecting them — gives a peculiar stamp to his work, which distinguishes it from all other expositions; and ever will render it valuable, as the repository of a most useful species of learning, not to be found in such abundance, anywhere else .
5. The next characteristic of the following Exposition, is, the felicity and frequency with which the text, at any time under consideration, is elucidated by parallel passages . If there were no more than a frequent and copious reference to such similar texts, it would not deserve particular notice as forming a distinguishing trait of this performance; for other commentators have exceeded Mr. Henry in this respect; and, indeed, a good concordance, with patient labor, is all that is requisite for the accomplishment of such a work.
But in Mr. Henry's references, there is often an ingenuity which borrows light from points where it was not perceived by others to exist. By an unexpected association and comparison of different passages, while he instructs us in that knowledge of the Scriptures which is derived from comparing spiritual things with spiritual, he, at the same time, fills us with an agreeable surprise, at the unlooked-for coincidence of points apparently remote from each other.
No one, I think, can read this commentary without being fully satisfied, that the Word of God dwelt richly in the mind of its author, in all wisdom and spiritual understanding. Indeed, it would seem that the contents of the Bible were constantly present to his mind, not merely in the way of recollecting them, but by a deep knowledge of their meaning and various bearings; so that he was able to survey each text by the aid of the concentrated light of the whole Bible.
I need not pause to recommend this mode of interpreting Scripture; for it recommends itself to every reflecting mind, and has the authority of apostolic precept. I will only remark, that it affords a double satisfaction to the lover of truth; for while he is thus enabled to understand a particular text more clearly — he, at the same time, discovers the harmony which exists between all the parts of divine revelation.
The only other thing which I shall mention, as characteristic of this work, is, its evangelical, spiritual, and practical cast . The truths of God are here presented simply, without being complicated with human philosophy, or encumbered with the technical distinctions of scholastic theology, or obscured by the mists of unintelligible metaphysics. Neither is the truth presented in a controversial form, but mostly, as if no controversy existed. No doubt controversy is necessary in its place, but the more it is excluded from the pulpit, and from books intended for the edification of the people at large — the more probability will there be, that the truth will produce its genuine effect.
It has been objected, that the author does not give sufficient prominence to some important truths taught in the word of God — but, if he has given a sound exposition of those passages in which these doctrines are contained, he has allowed them the same comparative length and breadth which they occupy in the Bible; and has preserved that proportion between the different parts of divine revelation, which the Holy Spirit has established. Indeed, this course is made necessary to the expositor of the whole Bible, unless he would leave his exposition to discuss particular points of doctrine. Besides, some truths, not more important than many others, occupy a large space in systems of polemic theology — because they have often been opposed or disputed.
No man who has written so much, and expressed so many opinions, as Mr. Henry has done in this commentary, will be likely to have the concurrence of any one thinking man, on every minute point; but it would be extremely difficult to find a book of such extent, which unites so many minds in it approbation. Men, who seem to differ considerably in doctrinal views, read this work respectively, with pleasure and edification. It is no difficult matter, indeed, to ascertain the author's theological opinions which are freely expressed, when the exposition of Scripture requires it; but he is moderate, and cautious of giving offence to those who differ from him; and by his unceasing effort to give a practical turn to every passage, he conciliates the pious reader's mind, even while he delivers opinions which he cannot adopt.
The end at which the author aimed, and of which he never lost sight in expounding a single text, was, to make men wise unto salvation; and the whole tendency of the work is to produce spiritual wisdom, an ardent love of holiness, and a conscientious and diligent regard to all the revealed will of God, in the performance of public and private duties.
It is an excellency, in this commentary, that the truths of Scripture are adapted, with great spiritual skill, to the various afflictions, conflicts, and temptations which are incident to the Christian life. The erring will here find reproof and direction, the sluggish excitement, the timid encouragement, the mourner comfort, and the growing Christian, confirmation, and increase of knowledge and assurance.
It may be more necessary for the unlearned to read such works as this, than for the learned; yet I am persuaded, that there is no man living, however learned, but might derive much practical instruction from Henry's Exposition of the Bible. If ministers of the gospel would spend much time in perusing this work, it would manifest itself by the richness and spirituality of their sermons and lectures.
The celebrated George Whitefield states, when speaking of his preparation for the work of the ministry, that he had read the whole of Henry's Exposition of the Bible, on his knees.
One principal reason why young clergymen, who possess this work, derive less benefit from it than they might, is, that they are in the habit, probably, of merely consulting the work, occasionally, when they want some aid in composing a sermon, or preparing an expository lecture for their people. But the full value of this commentary will never be perceived by those who thus use it. It should be carefully read, in course, and with a view to personal improvement in holiness . It is a melancholy fact, that our intellect may be vigorously exercised in discovering and arranging truths of the most important and practical kind, without the least personal edification. This is one of the many snares to which preachers of the gospel are liable, and from which it results, that their hearers often derive much more benefit from their studies, than they do themselves. It would be a great point gained, if ministers could learn the art of studying their sermons with the heart as well as the head ; and I know of few things which would more effectually tend to bring this about, than a frequent and serious perusal of Henry's Commentary; especially if fervent prayer were combined with the reading.
But after all that I have said, with the view of exhibiting the characteristics of this work, I am sensible that such general description can, at best, afford but inadequate ideas of the spirit and style of an author, so peculiar in his manner. There is in good writing, as in the human countenance, an expression, which mere words cannot depict. There is a penetrating savor — a diffusive spirit, which takes hold of the feelings of the reader, and for the time, assimilates his emotions and sentiments to those of the writer. To understand how this effect is produced by the tones of the living voice, accompanied with the animated expression of the countenance of a public speaker, is not so difficult; but to explain how the composition of one, long since dead, should still retain that penetrating, spirit-stirring energy, which we find in the writings of men, whose hearts were warm with holy affections, is not easy.
The fact, however, is certain — we experience the beneficial effect, when we peruse their works. In reading for edification, therefore, it is much greater utility to apply ourselves to the writings of men, who, while they wrote, felt the sacred flame of divine love glowing in their breasts — than to such as excel in mere intellectual vigor, or in elegance of style.
My principal object in this preface is, to persuade those who may take the trouble to read it, to enter seriously and resolutely on the perusal of the following work. Whatever other books of this kind may be possessed, still Henry's Exposition will prove a treasure to any family, if it be diligently studied ; without which no book can be useful.
Hitherto, this commentary has not been in general use in this country, because copies were not abundant; and the price of the work place it beyond the reach of many, who would have been pleased to possess it. But now, when a cheap, handsome American edition is issuing from the press, there is the best reason to hope, that it will be widely circulated and extensively read. It is worthy of notice, also, that the work is now presented to the public, not only in a very clear type, but also in a portable and convenient form. Many persons, who have not much leisure for reading, are intimidated at the sight of folio volumes; and to everyone their use is inconvenient. But I am still apprehensive, that the number and bulk of the volumes, will be a formidable obstacle to many. They will be apt to think, that they have neither time nor patience to finish such a task, and therefore will be disposed to decline the undertaking. But such persons ought to reflect, that it will not be necessary to read the whole, to obtain the benefit of a part; a single book perused with care, will not be without its advantage.
There is no solid reason, however, for those persons, who sincerely wish to study the Scriptures, to be discouraged by the extent of the work. For, although viewed in mass, it may seem to be an almost endless labor to those who can devote but little time to reading; yet, if any one would form a simple calculation, he would find, that the task can be accomplished with ease, in a very reasonable time.
Let us suppose, that only one half hour be appropriated to the perusal of this commentary in each of the days of the week, except the Lord's day, on which two hours might be conveniently spent in this exercise; and at this moderate rate of progress, the whole work would be finished in less than three years.
But although we have spoken of this undertaking as a "labor" and "a task," yet we are confident, that to the reader who thirsts for an increase of divine knowledge, it would be found, on experiment, to be a very precious privilege. Such a person would experience so much pleasure in the contemplation of scriptural truth, as here exhibited, and would find his mind so enriched with spiritual thoughts — that he would contract a lively relish for the exercise, and would be drawn to his work, when the season of performing it occurred, with something of the same strength of appetite, as that which urges him to partake of his daily food. He would feel the privation as sensibly when debarred from it, as when prevented from taking his usual bodily repast.
Those who have been long accustomed to spend an hour in the morning, in reading the news of the day — when, by any circumstance, this gratification is abstracted from them, appear really to feel as much uneasiness, as if prevented from breaking their fast.
And why may not a spiritual taste become as lively, as that which is experienced for the contents of a newspaper? Why may we not enjoy the contemplation of divine things with as strong a zest, as knowledge of another kind? Surely nothing is lacking to produce this effect, but a right disposition in ourselves. And the person who thus contracts a taste for the contents of these volumes, will find means for redeeming more time for reading than we have specified; so that the work, for which we have allowed three years, would, by many, be completed in one.
And this exposition is not a composition of that kind, which when once read, leaves no desire for a second perusal — but the spiritual reader will be led to mark many passages for a re-perusal; not because they were not understood at first, but because they afforded him so much delight, or communicated such seasonable instruction, that he desires to come again and again to the fountain , that he may be refreshed and strengthened.
But while we wish to raise in the minds of our readers a high estimation of the value of Henry's Commentary, we would not dismiss the subject without observing, that whatever luster the work possesses — it is all borrowed . The light with which it shines is reflected light. The whole value of this or any other similar work, consists merely in holding up clearly and distinctly, the truth which is contained in the sacred records . And whatever of spiritual wisdom, or of the savor of piety, is found in these pages, was all derived from the influence of that Holy Spirit, who inspired the prophets and apostles to write the Scriptures, and who still bestows grace and spiritual endowments on his chosen servants, by which they are qualified to preach and write, in such a manner, as to promote the edification of his church.
In every age, God raises up men for the defense of the gospel, and also for the exposition of his word; and some of these are honored not only with usefulness while they live, but with more abundant and extensive usefulness after their decease — so that being dead they still speak.
It is impossible to calculate how much good has been, and will still be effected by the pious labors of such men as Henry and Scott. Their works will be read in regions so remote and obscure, which never came to the knowledge of the pious writers. They will be read in the distant islands of the Pacific, and in the central regions of Africa, as well as in the most retired recesses of our own country. What an encouragement is this for men, who have the ability, to labor indefatigably in the communication and diffusion of divine truth?
Of books we have a superabundance, but of books of the proper kind — we have not half enough. Copies of works of undisputed excellence ought to be multiplied, until all who can read are supplied with the precious treasure.
But let God have the glory of every invention, of every gift, and of every work, by which the progress and diffusion of truth are promoted or facilitated; and let all that is said in praise of men, be so spoken, as to redound to the honor and glory of the Triune God! Amen.
《马太·亨利圣经注释》序言
阿奇博尔德·亚历山大著
选自《马太·亨利新旧约全书注释》(1708至1710年)美国初版(费城,1828年)
圣经注释可以很方便地分为两类:考据型注释和实践型注释。
第一类注释对原文的字词和短语作语法分析,力求确定每一处经文的字面含义;为了使别人能够判断解释是否正确,它把整个考据过程呈现在读者面前。这样的辅助资料对学者非常重要,因为无论在什么情况下,都必须先确定字面意义,才能适当地运用经文,也才能在这字面意义上建立其他解释。一个比喻或寓言是否恰当、力量何在、意思为何,惟有先明白所用字词的字面含义,才能知道;任何一处经文中所谓奥秘或属灵的含义,也是如此。
可是,无论这种考据分析何等必要,它都只能使有学问的人受益。因此,普通读者还需要另一类注释。他们在圣经真理中所关切的重大利益,与考据学者同样深切;他们也同样有查考圣经的义务。因为人人都必须为自己的信仰和实践交账,所以也必须有权为自己判断。
因此,应当为社会各等人预备最好的帮助,使众人都能对宗教这个至关重要的题目形成正确的见解。正因如此,人们写成了许多实践型的解经著作;这些著作所阐释的,不仅是零散经文和圣经中的个别书卷,也包括整本圣经。它们广泛发挥了益处,既使圣经更清楚,也教导人怎样应用启示的真理,来约束内心、引导生活。
在这一类著作中,亨利的《圣经注释》占有卓越的地位。这部著作摆在基督徒群体面前,至今已有一百多年;它从初次出版起就广受欢迎,也得到如此普遍的认可,以致如今再作任何推荐,似乎都是多余的。事实上,它已经成为神学领域的标准著作;不仅某一个宗派的人如此看待它,凡喜爱纯正敬虔和福音信仰的人,无论属于哪一种名号,都如此看待它。诚然,自从这部著作初次刊行以来,另有许多宝贵的注释问世,也当之无愧地得到很高评价和广泛流传。然而,我们可以稳妥地说:这些出版物没有一部取代亨利的《圣经注释》;在它特有的优点上,它仍是无可比拟的。
为了某些特定目的,也在某些特定方面,其他注释也许更为可取;然而,若从整体看,又考虑到它适合各等读者,便可以说,这部注释汇集的优点,比任何语言中曾经写成的同类著作都多。这也不只是一人或少数人的意见,成千上万有判断力的神学家都持同样看法。我们可以预言,只要英语仍保持现有形态,热爱真宗教的人就必高度珍视亨利的《圣经注释》。
我们写这篇序言,目的在于竭力指出这部伟大著作一些更为突出的特征,并提出若干理由,促使本国的基督徒研读它。
不过,在进一步论述以前,我要先指出:这部注释首要的优点,并不在于解答圣经中可能发现的难题。有些人查阅这部注释,是为了从晦涩难解的经文得到亮光,却没有如愿,因此发出抱怨;他们说,浅明的经文得到大篇幅阐释,困难的经文却只被简略提及,或全然略过不谈。
我们可以这样回答这项异议:若论实践用途,说明那些并不难解之经文的用途和应用,远比阐明晦涩经文更加重要。有一个普遍的事实,并且这事实无疑能给人安慰:圣经中最晦涩的部分,重要性也最低。然而,同样的异议也可以向一切注释提出;事实上,人们也的确这样批评过,说这些注释碰到难解经文时,仍让它们像原来一样晦涩。由此所得惟一合理的推论乃是:面对许多难以解释的经文,有学问的人与没有学问的人所处的位置十分相近。尽管如此,学者的劳苦无疑已经给圣经中许多内容带来亮光。
我们虽然不主张把这位注释家列在最高明的圣经考据学者之中,却有权说,亨利是一位根基稳固、造诣成熟的学者;他的传记作者尤其说,他是一位出色的希伯来文学者。这几卷书虽没有炫示考据学问,我们却不应因此以为,作者没有从考据角度审查每一处经文。
正如人们所说,演说家把一切技巧的痕迹隐藏起来时,才最完美地运用了雄辩之术;照样,我们也可以说,一个人教导百姓时,只把结论提供给他们,全不把自己得出这些结论所经过的学术过程摆在眼前,他才是把考据之术用得最好的人。
从作品内部的证据可以确定一件事实:亨利先生撰写《新旧约圣经注释》时,把普尔那部名为《考据家汇编》(Criticorum Synopsis)的学术汇编摊开在面前;因为每逢难解的经文,这部汇编都会列出许多意见,而亨利总是明智地从中选出一种整体看来最有可能正确的见解。
我们主张,就圣经的字面解释而言,我们的作者是一位根基稳固而富有才智的解经家;然而,我们并不把他享有卓越地位的根据,放在他的考据洞察力或渊博学识上,而是放在另外一些特质上;这些特质,我们现在就要逐一清楚说明。
一、先从这部著作的文体说起。我要指出,这里结合了两种并不常常并存的特质:清晰与简洁。它的文体清晰,随便查考《圣经注释》中的任何一页,就足以证明。我说这部作品清晰,是直接以没有学问之读者的能力和理解力为准。一种文体若主要由外来语源的词组成,对有学问的人也许像任何其他文体一样清楚,对普通读者却不是如此;普通读者所熟悉的,只是日常谈话中通常使用的那一类语言。亨利先生的文体,大体由纯正而历来通用的英语本土词汇构成,因此社会各等人都容易明白;它也亲切熟悉,因为所用的词,正是人人每天听惯的词。
可是,人们未必会同样爽快地承认,这文体也是简洁的。全书卷数之多、篇幅之大,似乎会把人引到不同的结论。事实上,我们看见六大对开本都出自一人之手,很自然也很容易作出一个有力的推断:他必定是一位行文铺张的作者。然而,对于我们这位解经家,事实并非如此。英语著作中,很少有哪一部比亨利的《圣经注释》写得更加简练、句句凝聚深意。细加考察,就会发现其中几乎没有赘词。每一个字都说话,每一句话都饱含意义;所以我不知道还能用什么方法删节这部书,除非舍去它的一部分内容。我们必须分清篇幅长与行文铺张的区别:一部短小的著作可能非常铺张,一部极长的著作却可能没有一个多余的字。
二、这部注释的文体另有一种特质,就是生动活泼。这个词没有准确表达我想传达的意思,但在我此刻所能想到的词里,它最为接近。我所指的,是那种令人愉悦的思想转折:一些意想不到的观念彼此联结,又以简洁锐利的形式表达出来;若用在其他题目上,人会称之为机智。事实上,如果容许我造一个短语来标明我现在所说的特质,我会称它为「属灵的机智」。
有人称这是一种明朗愉悦的文体。这部著作读起来,确实不但会使人的注意力保持清醒,也会使愉悦的情绪遍及心灵。若有人因阅读亨利的《圣经注释》而变得阴郁,他必是一个品性极坏的人。
无须我说,这项特质对一部如此宏大的作品何等重要。若没有它,无论内容多么卓越,读者还没有读完全书,疲倦早已一千次抓住他。这种文体似乎就是这位敬虔作者思想天然的走向与气质,其中没有矫揉造作,没有不自然的比较,也没有勉强拼凑的对偶。诚然,它有时接近人所谓的古雅奇巧,也常用发音相近、意思却不同的字词作文字游戏;这些虽然不符合现代品味的标准,却非常合广大民众的口味,也使人阅读时如此兴味盎然,以致我们几乎不容自己希望他的文体有任何不同。
三、不过,这部《圣经注释》还有一个比上述各项都更重要的特征,就是贯穿全书的敬虔思想既丰富又多样。作者的心思看来不但已经被卓越的属灵思想浸润,而且不断涌出这样的思想。他的心思好比长流不息的泉源,不住发出活水的江河。他从圣言中引出丰富的教导与安慰,适用于人的各种处境和各种性情;在这件事上,他显出思想的丰饶,也显出应用属神真理的巧妙,使我们不禁赞叹。
大多数人的才思,解完圣经中的几卷书便已经耗尽;此后除了陈旧平常的内容,或一再重复同样的思想,几乎不能再期待什么。我们这位解经家的心思却似乎有取之不尽的丰富。圣经一段接一段,他每次来到新的部分,都带着充实而新鲜的内容;他的评论丰富多样,一面教导我们,一面又使我们精神焕发。即使他所解释的几卷书内容十分相似,例如四福音书,我们仍在这位注释家的笔记中看到令人喜悦的变化。我们很难想象,一个人怎能完成这样一部著作,并且从始至终,写作品质竟丝毫没有下降。
诚然,亨利先生未能活到亲手完成这部注释。他已经为完成全书作了充分准备;然而,作品还在付印时,他便蒙召离开劳作的工场,使一切敬虔之人深感惋惜。不过,神的护理虽是难测的,却始终充满智慧。这位卓越的神仆蒙准在我们世上存留如此长久,又为教会的造就成就如此之多,不但服事他自己的时代,也惠及后世一切时代;这应当使我们满怀热切的感谢。
作者亲自完成这部注释,写到使徒行传末尾;其余各卷由他的几位朋友解释。他们在神学知识和敬虔上都很卓越;毫无疑问,他们各自着手所承担的部分时,也利用了亨利留下的文稿。每位续写者的姓名,都列在他所注释的书卷之前。读者虽然会感觉其中缺少亨利先生特有的生动活泼与巧妙的思想转折,却仍会发现,续成的注释写得精到而明智;由别人的手来写,能如此接近作者那无法仿效的文体,已经尽人所能。
四、这部作品中有许多分量十足、简练有力、一语中的的格言;也许再没有别的特质,比这更能赋予它鲜明的风貌。这些格言究竟大多出于作者本人的巧思,还是从当时流行的英国谚语公共宝库中搜集而来,对我们来说,它们的价值并无不同。
古人似乎比现代人更明白,用谚语或格言施教何等重要。在他们看来,创造谚语、比喻或寓言,以寥寥数语传达丰富含义,是智慧最高的运用。那些以「希腊智者」著称的人中,有几位除了留下少数广受赞同、后来成为谚语的言论以外,并没有别的著作,却仍因此闻名。
一个民族拥有一批优良谚语,其价值再高估也不为过。这些话不断被人使用、传播;社会各等人不费力气就能学会,并成为普通百姓用来规范生活的准则。
一个人的判断暂时悬而未决,后来因想起某句谚语或普遍准则而作出决定,这是再常见不过的事。人立定心意的那一刻,实际影响他的,正是当时浮现在心中的知识;因此,与储存实用知识的其他一切形式相比,格言有一项优势。其他学问好比积存的财宝,未必随时都能在仓促之间拿出来流通;这些格言却好比一国通用的钱币,随时可用,也始终在流通。
一个人若能创造几条简练有力、关乎道德或处世审慎的准则,使它们普遍流传,也许常常能像写一部详尽的道德学或政治经济学著作一样,对国家有益。有一件事实值得注意:有些地方的农民或普通百姓,彼此谈话时常常回想并复述切合情形的谚语;这些人通常也比一般人更有辨别力,更为审慎。
教导年轻人时,不应忽略这种简便的方法;它能充实并坚固他们的心思。父亲若把许多纯正、实用、关乎道德和处世审慎的格言灌输给儿女,他实际留给他们的产业,要比为他们预备同样多的珠宝更为丰厚。
此外,我们采用这种教导方法,还有最高的权威。圣经充满最重要的格言;其中有完整的一卷,由世上最有智慧的人写成,内容全是箴言。不仅如此,我们的主也以这种形式赐下许多教训。
著名的伊拉斯谟有一部最有用、最受推崇的著作,就是从所有希腊罗马作者的作品中汇集格言。若有人能以明智的判断,搜集一部有用的英国格言集,他就是给全体公众一份恩惠。不过,早在许多年前,笔者就想到,单从亨利的《圣经注释》,也能编成一小卷精选格言,既精良又实用。阅读这部作品的人若肯费力作这样的搜集,供自己、儿女或朋友使用,他绝不会有后悔自己劳苦的时候。我们的作者创作这类格言,思想极为丰沛;或说,他搜集格言极其勤奋。这就给他的作品盖上一个独特印记,使它与其他一切注释有别;它也必因此长久保有价值,成为一种极有用学问的宝库,因为这样的学问,在别处无法找到如此丰富的数量。
五、以下这部《圣经注释》的下一个特征,是作者用平行经文阐明当时所论经文时,既巧妙又频繁。如果他所做的不过是频繁而大量地列举这类相似经文,这就不值得特别提出,算作这部作品的显著特征;因为其他注释家在这方面胜过亨利先生。事实上,要完成这样的工作,只需一本好的经文汇编,再加上耐心劳苦就够了。
然而,亨利先生所引用的经文常常带着一种巧思:别人没有察觉某处有亮光,他却从那里借来亮光。他以出人意外的方式,把不同的经文彼此联结、互相比较,一面借着「将属灵的话解释属灵的事」所得的圣经知识教导我们,一面又使我们因那些表面上彼此相距遥远之处竟有意料不到的契合,而感到可喜的惊讶。
我想,没有人读完这部注释以后,还不能完全确信:神的话丰丰富富地住在作者心里,使他有各样的智慧和属灵悟性。圣经的内容似乎一直呈现在他心中;不只是他能回想起来,更是他深深认识这些内容的含义和各方面关系。因此,他能够借着整本圣经汇聚的亮光,察看每一处经文。
我无须停下来推荐这种解释圣经的方法;因为每一个认真思想的人,都会看见这方法本身的可取之处,而它也有使徒命令的权威。我只要指出,它使爱真理的人得到双重满足:一方面,他能借此更清楚地明白某一处经文;另一方面,他同时发现,属神启示的所有部分彼此和谐。
我要提到这部著作的最后一项特征,是它带着福音性、属灵性和实践性的风貌。神的真理在这里得到单纯的呈现,没有与人的哲学纠缠在一起,没有被经院神学的专门区分压得繁重,也没有被令人无法理解的形而上学迷雾遮蔽。真理也不是以争论的形式呈现,大多数时候,仿佛争论根本不存在。毫无疑问,争论在合宜的位置是必要的;不过,讲台和为造就广大百姓而写的书若越少卷入争论,真理就越有可能产生它真正的果效。
有人提出异议,说作者没有充分突出神话语所教导的某些重要真理。然而,他若已经纯正地解释了包含这些教义的经文,就已经让它们在注释中占有与圣经本身相同的相对篇幅和范围,也保存了圣灵在属神启示各部分之间所设立的比例。事实上,解释整本圣经的人若不愿离开自己的解经工作,转而讨论个别教义要点,就必须走这条道路。此外,有些真理并不比其他许多真理更重要,却在论战神学体系中占有很大篇幅,只因它们常受人反对或争议。
亨利先生在这部注释里写下如此多的内容,表达如此多的意见;任何一个会思想的人,都不大可能在每一个细微之处与他一致。然而,要找到另一部如此宏大的著作,又能使这么多人的心都赞同它,实在极其困难。一些人在教义见解上似乎差异颇大,却都各自怀着喜悦阅读这部作品,并从中得造就。要确定作者的神学见解,其实并不困难;每逢解释圣经有此需要,他都会坦率表达。不过,他态度温和,又谨慎避免冒犯与他意见不同的人;他也不住努力,使每一处经文都转向实践应用。因此,即使他提出敬虔读者不能接受的见解,仍能赢得他的心。
作者所追求、也在解释每一处经文时从未失去注意的目标,是使人有得救的智慧。这部作品的全部趋向,都是要使人产生属灵的智慧,热切爱慕圣洁,并且本着良心、殷勤留意神启示的一切旨意,履行公共和个人的义务。
这部注释还有一个优点:它以极高的属灵智慧,把圣经真理应用到基督徒一生可能遭遇的各种患难、争战和试探中。走错路的人会在这里找到责备和指引,迟钝的人找到激励,胆怯的人找到鼓舞,哀恸的人找到安慰,正在长进的基督徒则得到坚固,知识和确据也得以增长。
没有学问的人也许比有学问的人更需要阅读这样的著作;然而我深信,世上无论谁,不管学问多么渊博,都能从亨利的《圣经注释》得到许多实践教训。传福音的牧者若肯花大量时间研读这部著作,他们的讲章和解经教导就必因此显出丰富与属灵。
著名的乔治·怀特腓谈到自己为传道职分所作的预备时说,他曾跪着读完亨利的整部《圣经注释》。
拥有这部著作的年轻教牧人员,从中得到的益处往往少于他们原可得到的;一个主要原因是,他们大概习惯于只在偶尔需要帮助写讲章,或为百姓预备一堂解经讲授时,才查阅这部作品。可是,凡这样使用它的人,绝不会察觉这部注释完整的价值。人应当按顺序仔细通读它,并以自己在圣洁上长进为目标。我们的理智可能强有力地运作,去发现并整理最重要、最具实践意义的真理,自己却没有得到丝毫造就;这是一个令人忧伤的事实。这也是传福音之人容易落入的许多网罗之一;结果,他们的听众常常从他们的研读中得益,反而比他们本人所得更多。牧者若能学会一门功课,不仅用头脑,也用心灵研读自己的讲章,便是取得极大的进展。我所知道能最有效促成此事的方法,没有多少比经常、认真阅读亨利的《圣经注释》更好;尤其是阅读时若与热切祷告结合,就更是如此。
为了显明这部著作的特征,我虽已经说了以上这一切,却深知,对于一位行文方式如此独特的作者,这种概括描述最多只能使人形成远远不足的认识,不能真正领会他的精神和文体。优秀的文章如同人的面容,其中有一种神情,是单凭言语无法描画的。它有一种深入人心的意味,有一种弥漫全篇的气息,会抓住读者的感受,并且在阅读的那段时间里,使读者的情绪和思想渐渐与作者相似。一个公开演说的人以活的声音说话,又有面部生动的神情相伴;这种语调怎样产生同样效果,并不太难理解。然而,一个早已去世之人的文章,怎样仍能保有那种深入人心、激动心灵的力量(这力量可见于那些心中燃着圣洁情感之人的著作),却不容易说明。
不过,事实是确定的:我们阅读这些人的作品,的确亲身经历它们所带来的益处。因此,我们若为得造就而读书,那么,研读那些写作时胸中确有神圣之爱如火燃烧之人的作品,比研读那些只在智力强健或文体优美上出众之人的作品,有大得多的益处。
我写这篇序言,首要目的就是劝所有肯费心阅读它的人,认真而坚决地开始研读下面这部著作。无论一个家庭已经拥有多少其他同类书籍,只要殷勤研读,亨利的《圣经注释》仍会成为任何家庭的宝藏;若不殷勤研读,任何书都不可能使人受益。
到目前为止,这部注释在本国还没有得到普遍使用,因为书的数量不多,价格又使许多原本乐意拥有它的人无力购买。如今,一套价廉而装帧美观的美国版正在付印,我们便有最好的理由盼望,它会广泛流传,得到许多人阅读。还有一点值得注意:现在呈现在公众面前的这套书,不但字体十分清晰,开本也便于携带和使用。许多人没有太多闲暇阅读,一看见对开大卷就心生畏惧;对每一个人来说,这种大卷也都不便使用。然而,我仍担心,卷数之多、篇幅之大,会成为许多人眼中可怕的障碍。他们很容易以为,自己既没有时间,也没有耐心完成这样的任务,所以倾向于放弃着手。不过,这些人应当思想:要得到其中一部分的益处,不一定非要读完全书;只要用心读完一卷,也不会没有收获。
然而,真诚愿意研读圣经的人,没有充分理由因这部著作篇幅宏大而灰心。对于只能用很少时间阅读的人,从整体看,这项劳苦似乎几乎永无尽头;可是,只要作一个简单计算,就会发现,这任务能够在十分合理的时间内轻松完成。
假设每周除了主日以外,每天只拿出半小时阅读这部注释;主日则可以方便地用两小时来读。照这样适中的进度,不到三年就能读完全书。
我们虽把这件事称作「劳苦」和「任务」,却深信,对于渴望增长属神知识的读者,亲自尝试以后,必发现它是一项极其宝贵的特权。这样的人默想这里所呈现的圣经真理,会经历极大的喜悦;他的心思也会因属灵思想而变得如此丰富,以致对这项操练生出活泼的爱好。每逢预定操练的时间来到,吸引他去读书的渴望,会像催促他每天进食的食欲一样强烈。他若不得阅读,所感觉的缺失会十分真切,正如不能照常吃饭一样。
有些人长久习惯每天早晨花一小时阅读当日新闻;若因某种情形不能享受这件事,他们看来确实会感到非常不安,仿佛不能吃早饭一样。
那么,属灵的品味为什么不能像人对报纸内容的兴趣一样活泼呢?我们默想属神的事,为什么不能像获取其他知识一样兴味浓厚呢?要产生这种果效,所欠缺的只是我们自己里面正确的心志。一个人若这样爱上这几卷书的内容,就会设法赎回比我们刚才所说更多的时间来阅读;这样一来,我们原本预留三年完成的著作,许多人一年就能读完。
这部注释也不是那种读过一遍,就不再使人想读第二遍的作品。属灵的读者会在许多段落旁作上记号,预备再次阅读;不是因为第一次没有读懂,而是因为它们带给他的喜乐如此丰富,或赐给他的教导如此切合时宜,使他渴望一次又一次回到泉源,好重新得着振奋与力量。
不过,我们虽愿使读者心中高度珍视亨利《圣经注释》的价值,在结束这个题目以前仍要指出:这部著作所有的一切光彩,都是借来的;它所发的光,都是反射的光。这部著作或任何其他同类著作的全部价值,不过在于把圣经记载的真理清楚鲜明地高举在人面前。这些书页中无论有怎样的属灵智慧、怎样的敬虔馨香,全都来自圣灵的工作;这位圣灵曾感动众先知和使徒写下圣经,如今仍把恩典和属灵恩赐赐给祂所拣选的仆人,使他们能够以造就祂教会的方式讲道写作。
历世历代,神都兴起人来护卫福音,也解释祂的话;其中一些人不但在世时蒙神使用,死后反而产生更加丰盛、更为广远的益处,以致他们虽然死了,却仍旧说话。
亨利和司各特这样的人,以敬虔的劳苦已经成就、以后仍要成就多少益处,是无法计算的。他们的著作会在遥远偏僻、这些敬虔作者从未听闻的地方得到阅读。无论太平洋远方的岛屿、非洲中部的地区,还是我们本国最隐蔽的偏远角落,人都会读到这些著作。这对那些有能力的人,是何等大的鼓励,催促他们不倦地劳苦,把属神的真理传给人,使它广为流传!
我们的书籍多得过剩;可是,合宜种类的书籍,连所需的一半都还不够。那些公认卓越的作品,应当不断增印,直到每一个能读书的人,都得到这宝贵的财富。
然而,一切能促进真理前行与传播,或使它更为便利的发明、恩赐和工作,都当把荣耀归给神;一切称赞人的话,也都当说得使荣耀归于三一神!阿们。